№ 2 (16) – 2021 

 

FEATURES OF CALCULATION MAIN PARAMETERS OF THE ABOVE AREAS OF LOSS WITH THE APPLICATION OF SIMULATION MODELING
https://doi.org/10.37129/2313-7509.2021.16.108-114
 
 завантаження D. Novak
                                                        
 завантаження R. Shostak
 
 

FULL TEXT: PDF (in Ukrainian)
 

Cite in the List of bibliographic references (DSTU 8302:2015)

Новак Д. А., Шостак Р. С. Особливості розрахунку основних параметрів приведених зон ураження із застосуванням імітаційного моделювання. Збірник наукових праць Військової академії (м. Одеса). 2021. Вип. 2(16). С. 108-114. https://doi.org/10.37129/2313-7509.2021.16.108-114 
 

Abstract
During the scientific and technical support of work on the development of promising models of artillery and missile weapons, a large number of applied studies are carried out, including those related to the evaluation of the effectiveness of the defeat of promising models of weapons of typical purposes. Thus, even at the stage of designing promising models of weapons, it is possible to evaluate the technical solutions proposed by the Developer, which can be considered as a safeguard against design errors and unnecessary costs.
Assessment of the impact of the impact of promising ammunition, including combat equipment of missiles and rockets is carried out, as a rule, by calculating the basic parameters of the above areas of destruction of typical targets. It is known that the given area of the target by a certain type of ammunition means a certain conditional area around the object within which the explosion of ammunition leads to a guaranteed damage to the object. When solving the problem of assessing the effectiveness of hitting targets with ammunition zone (remote) action instead of the actual shape (configuration) of the given zones of destruction of elementary targets use one of the simple geometric shapes – a rectangle or circle. These simplifications affect the accuracy and quality of calculations, especially in solving problems of quantitative and qualitative assessment of the power of promising ammunition zone (remote) action.
The article highlights the features of the calculation of the main parameters of the given zones of destruction of elementary targets by ammunition of zone (remote) action with the use of simulation modeling, and also describes the main features of the developed simulation model.

Keywords
 
target destruction efficiency, reduced impact zone, simulation, missile, rocket, high-explosive fragmentation munition, high-explosive fragmentation warhead.
 

List of bibliographic references 
  1. Аверьянов А. И. Теоретические основы управления огнем наземной артиллерии. ВАОЛКА им. М.И. Калинина, 1978. 454 с.
  2. Балаганский И. А., Мержиевский Л. А. Действие средств поражения и боеприпасов. Новосибирск : НГТУ, 2004. 408 с.
  3. Буравлёв А. И. К вопросу определения приведенной зоны поражения. Вооружение и экономика, 2018. Вып. 2 (44). С. 11-16.
  4. Запорожец В. И. Боевая эффективностьсредств поражения и боеприпасов. Санкт-Петербург : БГТУ, 2006. 159 с.
  5. Бабкин А. В., Велданов В. А., Грязнов Е. Ф. и др. Средства поражения и боеприпасы : Учебник / Под общ. ред. В.В. Селиванова Москва : МГТУ им. Н.Э. Баумана, 2008. 984 с.
  6. Menter. F.R. Two-Equastion Eddy-Viscosity Turbulence Models for Engineering Aplication. AIAA Journ.Vol. 32, No. 8. Р. 1598-1605.
  7. Нилсен Дж. Аэродинамика управляемых снарядов. Москва : ИД «Оборонгиз», 1962. 236 с.
  8. Вербицкий В. М. Основы численных методов: учебник для ВУЗов. Москва : Высш. шк., 2002. 840 с.
  9. Буртняк І. В. Імітаційне моделювання. Методичні рекомендації. Івано-Франківськ. ПНУ ім. В. Стефаника, 2006. 97 с.
  10. Митюков Н. Методика определения бронепробиваемости. Морской сборник, 2008. Вып. 1. С. 37-41.
 

References
  1. Averyanov, A.I. (1978). Theoretical foundations of ground artillery fire control. VAOOLKA them. M.I. Kalinina, Publ. [in Russian].
  2. Balagansky, I.A., & Merzhievsky, L.A. (2004). The action of weapons and ammunition. Novosibirsk: MGTU, Publ. [in Russian].
  3. Buravlev, A. I. (2018). On the question of determining the reduced affected area. Armament and economics, 2018. 2 (44), 11–16[in Russian].
  4. Zaporozhets, V.I. (2006). Combat effectiveness of weapons and ammunition. St. Petersburg: BGTU,[in Russian].
  5. Babkin, A.V., Veldanov, V.A., Gryaznov, E.F., et. al. & Selivanov, V. V. (Ed.). (2008). Means of destruction and ammunition. Moscow: MGTU, Publ. [in Russian].
  6. Menter, F. R. (n.d.). Two-Equastion Eddy-Viscosity Turbulence Models for Engineering Aplication. AIAA Journ,32, 8, 1598-1605 [in English].
  7. Nielsen, J. (1962). Aerodynamics of guided projectiles. Moscow: Oborongiz, Publ. [in Russian].
  8. Verbitsky, V. M. (2002). Fundamentals of Numerical Methods. Moscow: Higher. shk., Publ. [in Russian].
  9. Burtnyak, I. V. (2006). Simulation. Guidelines. Ivano-Frankivsk. PNU them. V. Stefanika [in Ukrainian].
  10. Mityukov, N. (2008). Method for determining armor penetration. Marine collection, 1, 37-41.[in Russian].

 

  

 
Copyright 2014 16.108-114 (eng) А. Розроблено ІОЦ ВА
Templates Joomla 1.7 by Wordpress themes free