№ 1 (17) – 2022

ON THE QUESTION OF THE DISTRIBUTION OF HOMOGENEOUS WEAPONS ACCORDING TO THE SET OF ENEMY OBJECTS TAKING INTO ACCOUNT RISKS
https://doi.org/10.37129/2313-7509.2022.17.136-142
 
завантаження O. Semenenko, Doctor of Military Sciences, Professor

 
завантаження A. Iefimenko, Candidate of Military Science, Associate Professor
завантаження O. Vodchyts, Candidate of Technical Sciences, Associate Professor
завантаження Yu. Dobrovolskyi, Candidate of Technical Sciences, Associate Professor
завантаження V. Lukhanin
завантаження M. Yarmolchyk
 
 

Cite in the List of bibliographic references (DSTU 8302:2015)

Семененко О. М., Єфіменко А. Є., Водчиць О. Г., Добровольський Ю. Б., Луханін В. В., Ярмольчик М. О. Щодо розподілу однорідних засобів ураження за сукупністю об'єктів противника з урахуванням ризиків. Збірник наукових праць Військової академії (м. Одеса).2022. Вип. 1(17). С. 136-142. https://doi.org/10.37129/2313-7509.2022.17.136-142 
 

Аbstract
Russian armed aggression against Ukraine has intensified research by Ukrainian scientists related to the development of weapons and military equipment and increasing the effectiveness of its combat use. The first months of the war showed that aviation and rocket troops and artillery are one of the key elements in the conduct of most large-scale operations in order to repulse the enemy and destroy his manpower and weapons and military equipment. In order to achieve the necessary results in carrying out various types of military operations, it becomes necessary to constantly make decisions on the use of certain troops (forces), means of destruction in order to destroy the enemy and inflict such losses on him, contributing to the achievement of the main goal of the operation. One of the important issues in the study of the problems of the optimal use of weapons is the solution of problems of target distribution of different content. For example, distribution over homogeneous or heterogeneous targets, protected or not protected, etc. The most relevant for research is the solution of the problem of distributing homogeneous means of attack over a set of objects of destruction, taking into account their degree of protection. Therefore, in the article, the authors propose one approach to the distribution of homogeneous weapons over the totality of enemy objects, taking into account the risks of hitting one's own weapons and the coefficients of importance of enemy objects in case of defeat. The proposed methodological approach is based on a mathematical model of decision-making on the defeat of enemy targets under conditions of risk, that is, their active countermeasures. Further prospects for research on the topic of the article include the need for practical implementation of the proposed approach in the form of calculation programs, as well as the search for the possibility of adapting it to the decision-making environment under conditions of uncertainty.

Кeywords
means of destruction, means of counteraction, mathematical programming, probability of defeat, weapons and military equipment, decision-making under risk.
 

List of bibliographic references
  1. Російське вторгнення в Україну (2022). URL: https://uk.wikipedia.org/wiki83_(2022) (дата звернення: 07.03.2022).
  2. Генеральний Штаб ЗСУ. Офіційна сторінка facebook. URL: https://www.facebook.com/groups/326198529525512 / (дата звернення: 02.02.2022).
  3. Семененко О., Добровольський Ю., Ярмольчик М., Рахманий О., Тарасов О., Ремез А. Українська військово-економічна ядерна бомба вже розірвалася у економіці Росії (ретроспектива, дійсне та майбутнє). Journal of Scientific Papers“Social Development and Security”, Vol. 12, No. 1, 2022. С. 179–197. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33445/sds.2022.12.1.17.
  4. Semenenko O., Vodchyts O., Bulhakov A., Remez A., Remez V. Methodological approach to justification of decisions on update of samples of weapons and military equipment on the basis of the criteria of economy of economy of performance by them of tasks on purpose. Sciences of Europe, vol 3, № 63 (2021), pp. 49–55.
  5. Венцель Е. С. Исследование операций. М., Советское радио 1972, 551 с.
  6. Зайченко Ю. П. Исследование операций. Киев, Вища школа, 1975,320 с.
  7. SIPRI Yearbook 2000-2020: Armaments, Disarmament and International Security Summary. Stockholm International Peace Research Institute. 2020. URL: http://www.sipri.org/earbook/2013/files/SIPRIYB13Summary.pdf.
  8. Динаміка змін кількості ОВТ у складі ЗСУ. 2018. URL: https://iportal.rada.gov.ua/uploads/documents/52952.pdf. (дата звернення: 02.02.2022).
  9. Романченко І. С., Шуєнкін В. О., Можаровський В. М. Теорія відверненого збитку : монографія. Львів: Національна академія Сухопутних військ України, 2017. 244 с.
  10. Ben Moores, Georgios Salapasidis, Paul Burton. The IHS Balance of Trade 2014 – The Changing Worldwide Defence Market. Focus on: Eastern Europe, Middle East & Sub-Saharan Africa // IHS Aerospace, Defence & Security. 2014. URL: http://www.ihs.com/balanceoftrade. (дата звернення: 02.02.2022).
  11. Зангвил У. И. Нелинейное програмирование. М., Советское радио, 1973, 312 с.
  12. Військова енциклопедія. М .: Воениздат, 2001. том 5. с. 190.
  13. Жуков Г. П., Викулов С. Ф. Военно-экономический анализ и исследование операций / Учебник для слушателей Военного финансово-экономического факультета при Московском финансовом институте. М.: Воениздат, 1987. 440 с .
  14. Теоретичні основи матеріально-технічного забезпечення військ (сил): навч. посіб. Київ: ЦНДІ ЗС України, 2010. 923 с.
  15. Емельянов С. В. Модели и методы векторной оптимизации. В сб.: Техническая кібернетика. т. 5. Под ред. Б. Н. Петрова. М., 1973. АН СССР, ВИНИТИ, C. 477.
  16. Военный энциклопедический словарь. / Н. В. Огарков, А. Т. Алтунин, М. А. Гареев и др. Москва: Военное издательство, 1984. 863 с.
  17. Зеленский В. А. Проектирование сложных систем / Пособие Минобрнауки России. Самар, гос. аэрокосм, ун-т им. С. П. Королева (нац. исслед. ун-т). Самара 2012.
 
 
 

References
  1. Russian invasion of Ukraine. (2022). Retrieved from: https://uk.wikipedia.org/wiki83_(2022). [in Ukrainian].
  2. General Staff of the Armed Forces of Ukraine. official page facebook. (n.d.). Retrieved from: https://www.facebook.com/groups/326198529525512 [in Ukrainian].
  3. Semenenko O., Dobrovolsky Yu., Yarmolchyk M., Rakhmany O., Tarasov O., & Remez A. (2022). The Ukrainian military-economic nuclear bomb has already exploded in the Russian economy (retrospective, present and future). Journal of Scientific Papers “Social Development and Security”, 12, 1, 179-197. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33445/sds.2022.12.1.17. [in Ukrainian].
  4. Semenenko O., Vodchyts O., Bulhakov A., Remez A. & Remez V. (2021). Methodological approach to justification of decisions on update of samples of weapons and military equipment on the basis of the criteria of economy of economy of performance by them of tasks on purpose. Sciences of Europe, 63 (3), 49–55. [in Ukrainian].
  5. Wenzel, E. S. (1972). Research of operations. Sovetskoye radio Publ. [in Russian].
  6. Zaichenko, Yu. P. (1975). Research of operations. Vyshcha shkola Publ. [in Russian].
  7. SIPRI Yearbook 2000-2020: Armaments, Disarmament and International Security Summary. Кyiv-Stockholm International Peace Research Institute. (2020). Retrieved from http://www.sipri.org/earbook/2013/files/SIPRIYB13Summary.pdf. [in English].
  8. Dynamics of changes in the number of weapons in the Armed Forces. (2018). Retrieved from https://iportal.rada.gov.ua/uploads/documents/52952.pdf. [in Ukrainian].
  9. Romanchenko, I. S., Shuenkin, V. O. & Mozharovsky, V. M. (2017). Theory of averted damage: a monograph. National Academy of Land Forces of Ukraine Publ. [in Ukrainian].
  10. Moores, B., Salapasidis, G., & Burton, P. (2014). The IHS Balance of Trade 2014 – The Changing Worldwide Defence Market. Focus on: Eastern Europe, Middle East & Sub-Saharan Africa. IHS Aerospace, Defence & Security. Retrieved from http://www.ihs.com/balanceoftrade. [in English].
  11. Zangvil, U. I. (1973). Nonlinear programming. M., Sovetskoye radio Publ. [in Russian].
  12. Military encyclopedia (2001). Voenizdat Publ. [in Russian].
  13. Zhukov, G. P., & Vikulov, S. F. (1987). Military-economic analysis and operations research. Voyenizdat Publ. [in Russian].
  14. Theoretical foundations of material and technical safety of forces. (2010). Central Reseach Institute of Ukraine of Amerd Forces in Ukraine Publ. [in Ukrainian].
  15. Emelyanov, S. V. (1973). Models and methods of vector optimization. In: Technical cybernetics. v. 5. Ed. B. N. Petrova. Academy of Sciences of the USSR Publ. [in Russian].
  16. Ogarkov, N. V., Altunin, A. T., Gareyev, M. A. (1984). Military encyclopedic dictionary. Voenizdat Publ. [in Russian].
  17. Zelenskiy V. A. (2012). Design of complex systems: Manual of the Ministry of Education and Science of Russia. Samara, gos. aerokosm, un-t im. S. P. Koroleva nats. issled. un-ta. Samarayu Publ. [in Russian].
Copyright 2014 17.136-142 (eng) А. Розроблено ІОЦ ВА
Templates Joomla 1.7 by Wordpress themes free