| Collection of scientific works of Odesa Military Academy |
| ISSN (Print) 2313-7509 |
| 2 - 2025 (24) |
| DOI: https://doi.org/10.37129/2313-7509.2025.24.2.11 |
| METHODOLOGY FOR DETERMINING THE OPTIMAL COMPOSITION OF RECONNAISSANCE AND STRIKE SYSTEMS BASED ON UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLES |
| УДК 623.4:629.735.33:519.876.5 |
| Semenenko O. M. | https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6477-3414 |
| Slyusarenko M. O. | https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4165-3908 |
| Korkina N. O. | https://orcid.org/0009-0004-8920-0363 |
| Dobrovolskyi Yu. B. | https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1077-1402 |
| Yarmolchyk M. O. | https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9917-0189 |
Abstract
The article proposes a methodology for determining the optimal composition of reconnaissance-strike complexes formed on the basis of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), taking into account the specifics of combat missions, the operational environment, and the technical characteristics of the systems.
The relevance of the study is driven by the rapid increase in the role of UAVs in contemporary armed conflicts, the need to improve the effectiveness of their combat employment, and to minimize losses of equipment and personnel.
The methodology is based on a comprehensive approach that includes: classification of UAVs by functional role, formalization of mission parameters, the use of mathematical models of interaction within a swarm, and optimization algorithms.
The work takes into account results of recent research in the fields of autonomous control, trajectory planning, resource allocation, and operations under adversary countermeasures. Special attention is given to the use of artificial intelligence technologies, adaptive decision-making algorithms implemented at the edge (edge AI), as well as secure interaction between swarm elements via blockchain architectures.
The proposed approach enables formation of balanced reconnaissance-strike complexes tailored to a given combat situation, thereby increasing the effectiveness of reconnaissance, strike, and support tasks. It is aimed at achieving a balance between combat effectiveness, system cost, and resilience to kinetic and electronic-warfare effects. Practical implementation of the methodology demonstrated effectiveness during simulation of a strike against air-defense assets of a notional adversary. The results can be used for operational planning and for the development of automated UAV control systems.
Keywords: reconnaissance-strike complexes; unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs); mathematical model; optimization; objective function; initial parameters; effectiveness.
FULL TEXT (in Ukrainian)
REFERENCES
1. Fedorovich, O., Kosenko, V., Kharchenko, A., & Fesenko, A. (2024). Modeling waves of a strike drones swarm for a massive attack on enemy targets. Radioelectronic and Computer Systems, (2), 203-212. https://doi.org/10.32620/reks.2024.2.16
2. Zieliński, T. (2021). Factors determining a drone swarm employment in military operations. Safety & Defense, 7(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.37105/sd.112
3. Wang, L., Wang, K., Pan, C., Xu, W., Aslam, N., & Hanzo, L. (2020). Multi-agent deep reinforcement learning based trajectory planning for multi-UAV assisted mobile edge computing. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2009.11277
4. Sun, S., Zhang, G., Mei, H., Wang, K., & Yang, K. (2020). Optimizing multi-UAV deployment in 3D space to minimize task completion time in UAV-enabled mobile edge computing systems. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2010.12894
5. Li, M., Cheng, N., Gao, J., Wang, Y., Zhao, L., & Shen, X. (2020). Energy-efficient UAV-assisted mobile edge computing: Resource allocation and trajectory optimization. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2007.15105
6. Kim, J., Gadsden, S. A., & Wilkerson, S. A. (2020). A comprehensive survey of control strategies for autonomous quadrotors. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2005.09858
7. Enhancing UAV swarm tactics with edge AI: Adaptive decision making in changing environments. (2024). Drones, 8(10), Article 582. https://doi.org/10.3390/drones8100582
8. Advanced drone swarm security by using blockchain governance game. (2022). Mathematics, 10(18), Article 3338. https://doi.org/10.3390/math10183338
9. Johnson, J. (2020). Artificial intelligence, drone swarming and escalation risks in future warfare. The RUSI Journal, 165(2), 26-36. https://doi.org/10.1080/03071847.2020.1752026
10. Swarm-based counter UAV defense system. (2021). Discover Internet of Things, 1(1), Article 2, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43926-021-00002-x
11. Holovchenko, O. V., Stetsiuk, R. M., & Lisohor, B. V. (2024). Analiz zdobutykh urokiv vedennia boiovykh dii rozviduvalno-vohnevymy kompleksamy pid chas vidsichi ta strymuvannia shyrokomasshtabnoi zbroinoi ahresii rosiiskoi federatsii proty Ukrainy [Analysis of the lessons learned from combat operations with reconnaissance-strike complexes during the repulsion and deterrence of large-scale armed aggression of the Russian Federation against Ukraine]. Mizhnarodnyi naukovyi zhurnal «Hraal nauky», (37), 114-121. [in Ukrainian]
12. Steshenko, P. M., Bohoslavets, S. O., Duzhyi, R. V., & Luzhbina, O. B. (2024). Masshtaby boiovoho zastosuvannia ta perspektyvy rozvytku udarnykh bezpilotnykh aviatsiinykh kompleksiv syl oborony Ukrainy [Scale of combat use and prospects for the development of strike unmanned aerial complexes of the Defense Forces of Ukraine]. Zbirnyk naukovykh prats DNDIA, 20(27), 134-139. [in Ukrainian].
The article was submitted 04.11.2025
© Semenenko, O.M., Slyusarenko, M.O., Korkina, N.O., Dobrovolskyi, Yu.B., Yarmolchyk, M.O.
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0)